An Open Letter to Mayor Nenshi et al.
October 19, 2010 28 Comments
After motivating myself with my most recent post, Preventing Puppy Mills, I have sent the following letter to all addressed. I encourage any like-minded individuals to sign and send a copy of this – or a similar – letter themselves. All the contact information you need is below. Let’s make a change!
October 19, 2010
|Mr. Naheed Nenshi
Office of the Mayor
The City of Calgary
P.O. Box 2100, Station
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5Via E-mail: email@example.com
Via Facsimile: 403-268-8130
|Aldermanic Offices (8001)
The City of Calgary
P.O. Box 2100, Station M
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5
Via Facsimile: 403-268-8091 and
Congratulations to all for your recent election wins! And congratulations on making this the most exciting civic election Calgary has seen in recent memory.
I know you’re all going to be very busy, adjusting to working together as a team, and tackling issues like the budget, Enmax, and the airport tunnel. But once the dust settles and you’ve found your groove, I have a request.
As you may or may not know, this month Richmond, B.C. became the first Canadian city to agree to ban the sale of dogs and puppies in pet stores. Their by-law is expected to be finally adopted in November and to take effect on April 30, 2011.
I would like Calgary to follow suit.
I am requesting that our new city council work together on a by-law to prevent the sale of companion animals (dogs and cats) in pet stores. This is a slight expansion on Richmond’s by-law, since I am proposing Calgary ban the sale of all companion animals in pet stores, not just dogs.
Calgary is a very progressive city when it comes to its By-Law and Animals Services, and we are held as an example world-wide on how we deal with our animal laws. As our city’s population grows, the number of “aggressive dog incidents” is on the decline, and it is no coincidence; we hold owners responsible for their pets’ actions. We don’t discriminate on size or breed, and our city is also a leader in pet licensing, with estimates stating over 90% of pet dogs in our city our licensed.
A by-law preventing the sale of dogs and cats in pet stores can only add to our résumé.
Preventing the sale of dogs and cats in pet stores does two things:
1. It eliminates a medium through which puppy mills sell their dogs and “kitten factories” sell their kittens; and
2. It prevents the impulse purchase of pets.
Point (1) should be obvious. Puppy mills and “kitten factories” are high volume breeders who have little to no regard to the mental and physical well being of both their “breeding stock” animals and the offspring they sell. The animals are bred in sub-standard and inhumane conditions – often in dirty, cramped kennels, literally living in their own feces. They experience zero socialisation with other animals or human beings, and are malnourished and over-bred. There is no concern for hereditary health conditions or inbreeding; the goal is to produce and sell as many puppies and kittens as possible. Look it up – the horrors will make your stomach churn. These puppies and kittens are then taken from their parents well before the recommended 8-10 week age, resulting in inevitable behaviour issues, just so that they are young and cute for the pet store window. The squalid conditions they are born in and the disregard for proper breeding standards often results in serious undiagnosed and hereditary medical health problems. And then, once owners are faced with these unexpected problems, these animals usually end up in shelters.
This leads us to point (2), preventing impulse pet purchases, which will help reduce the population of rescue animals. Pet owners who did not properly think through their purchase and what they were getting into are a large supplier of rescue dogs in the first instance.
In addition, not allowing pet stores to sell companion animals will allow rescue organizations and reputable breeders to fill the niche. Shelter adoptions will increase, and as a result euthanasia will decrease. Albuquerque, New Mexico has noticed a shelter adoption increase of 23% and euthanasia decrease of 35% since enacting their ban in 2006.
No, bans like the proposed will not completely solve the problem, since the internet is still a popular tool used by puppy mills and the like, but it does remove one medium of sale while also creating public awareness.
And if we look to Richmond, B.C. as an example (and the several American cities with similar bans in place), such a by-law is generally met with widespread public support. Granted, a couple of pet stores will undoubtedly voice their opposition, but Richmond’s Mayor Brodie said it best: “It seems to be acknowledged by all the parties that there is a problem with so-called puppy mills, that sell dogs in very high volumes and that are subjected to inhumane treatment. So it’s a question of how do we deal with that. At the local level, there are only a few levers at our disposal, and we want to do what we can.”
I would like Calgary to do what it can.
For this, I would like to provide you with the section of Albuquerque’s Code of Ordinances on this issue as an example (Ch. 9, Article 2):
§ 9-2-4-4 SALE OR GIFT OF AN ANIMAL.
(A) Public Property. No Person shall display, sell, deliver, offer for sale, barter, auction, give away, or otherwise dispose of an Animal upon a street, sidewalk, public park, public right-of-way or other public property. Adoption events approved by the Mayor, or any adoption events held by a Rescue Group or Rescue individual are exempt.
(B) Commercial Property. No Person shall display, sell, deliver, offer for sale, barter, auction, give away, or otherwise dispose of any Animal upon commercial property including parking lots, with or without the property owner’s permission. [Permit] Holders are limited to the property the Permit was issued for. Adoption events approved by the Mayor are exempt.
(C) Residential Property. No Person shall display, sell, deliver, offer for sale, barter, auction, give away, or otherwise dispose of any Companion Animal puppies or kittens upon residential property without a Litter Permit.
(D) Sales Incentives. No Person shall offer a live Animal as an incentive to purchase merchandise or as a premium, prize, award, or novelty.
(E) Advertising. No Person shall advertise puppies or kittens for sale in any local periodical without a valid Litter Permit number conspicuously listed in the advertisement. No Person shall advertise any Animal for sale in the City of Albuquerque using any roadside signs, flyers, handbills or billboards.
With this in mind, I request council consider a similar addition to Calgary’s by-laws.
I thank you very much for your time.
Voter; Ward ___ Resident
Dale Hodges, Ward 1 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org
Gord Lowe, Ward 2 Alderman, email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org
Jim Stevenson, Ward 3 Alderman, email@example.com
Gael Macleod, Ward 4 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org
Ray Jones, Ward 5 Alderman, email@example.com
Richard Pootmans, Ward 6 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Druh Farrell, Ward 7 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org
John Mar, Ward 8 Alderman, email@example.com
Gian-Carlo Carra, Ward 9 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org
Andre Chabot, Ward 10 Alderman, email@example.com
Brian Pincott, Ward 11 Alderman, firstname.lastname@example.org
Shane A. Keating, Ward 12 Alderman, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Diane Colley-Urquhart, Ward 13 Alderman, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Peter Demong, Ward 14 Alderman, email@example.com
City Clerk’s Office, firstname.lastname@example.org
City of Calgary, Animal & By-Law Services, via facsimile: 403-268-4927
Calgary Humane Society, email@example.com